Aswath Damodaran: Fed Up With FED Talk

In this article and video, NYU professor Aswath Damodaran makes the data-driven case that the Federal Reserve’s influence over interest rates, the economy, and financial markets is far more limited than conventional wisdom suggests.

Here are the key take-aways:

  • The Federal Reserve does not actually set most interest rates that consumers and businesses face, such as mortgage rates, credit card rates, or corporate bond rates. The Fed only directly controls the Fed Funds rate.
  • Changes in the Fed Funds rate does not lead or drive changes in market interest rates like Treasury yields. Analysis shows little difference in Treasury rate movements following Fed rate changes.
  • The signals sent by the Fed’s actions are often ambiguous and open to interpretation. For example, the recent 0.50% rate cut could be seen as a sign of lower inflation, slowing economic growth, or political motivations.
  • Outside of crisis situations, the Fed’s impact on stock market returns is unclear. Data shows no significant difference in stock returns following Fed rate changes.
  • The perception of the Fed’s power over the economy and markets has grown to unhealthy levels. In reality, the Fed is more of a follower than a leader and does not have the ability to override economic fundamentals. Attributing too much influence on the Fed distracts from more important economic issues.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Bill Nygren: A Modern Approach To Value Investing

In this interview, Bill Nygren reflects on his career mistakes and lessons learned. These insights highlight the importance of balancing conviction with caution in investing and the need for value investors to adapt their strategies to include companies with significant intangible assets.

Howard Marks: Value matters more than quality

In this interview, Howard Marks shares his investment philosophy and lessons learned over his 55-year career, including contrarian investing, value versus quality and the inevitable market cycles.

Mohnish Pabrai: The Boom-Bust Mental Model

In this interview at the 2025 MOI Global, Mohnish Pabrai shares insights on his investment philosophy and current market perspectives. The conversation covers various industries and investment approaches, with particular focus on cyclical businesses and special situations.