Aswath Damodaran: Fed Up With FED Talk

In this article and video, NYU professor Aswath Damodaran makes the data-driven case that the Federal Reserve’s influence over interest rates, the economy, and financial markets is far more limited than conventional wisdom suggests.

Here are the key take-aways:

  • The Federal Reserve does not actually set most interest rates that consumers and businesses face, such as mortgage rates, credit card rates, or corporate bond rates. The Fed only directly controls the Fed Funds rate.
  • Changes in the Fed Funds rate does not lead or drive changes in market interest rates like Treasury yields. Analysis shows little difference in Treasury rate movements following Fed rate changes.
  • The signals sent by the Fed’s actions are often ambiguous and open to interpretation. For example, the recent 0.50% rate cut could be seen as a sign of lower inflation, slowing economic growth, or political motivations.
  • Outside of crisis situations, the Fed’s impact on stock market returns is unclear. Data shows no significant difference in stock returns following Fed rate changes.
  • The perception of the Fed’s power over the economy and markets has grown to unhealthy levels. In reality, the Fed is more of a follower than a leader and does not have the ability to override economic fundamentals. Attributing too much influence on the Fed distracts from more important economic issues.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Aswath Damodaran: The Sugar Daddy Effect

In his latest article, NYU professor Aswath Damodaran explores the common challenges faced by three types of entities that have access to assured funding: corporate venture capital, sovereign wealth funds, and green energy investments.

Bill Nygren: Investing without a catalyst

In a recent interview, Bill Nygren from Oakmark reflects on his 40-year investment career, highlighting the significance of both financial metrics and management quality in selecting companies.