Aswath Damodaran: Globalization Backlash

In his recent article, NYU professor Aswath Damodaran shares his thoughts on how politics, globalization, and disruption has changed the investing landscape.

Here are the key takeaways:

  • Globalization, which dominated economics for decades, has peaked and is facing pushback. The 2008 financial crisis exposed failures of the expert class, leading to a loss of trust and the rise of anti-globalization sentiment.
  • Disruption, initially driven by tech startups, is now extending into politics and government. Countries like El Salvador and Argentina have seen disruptive leaders challenge norms, and similar trends are emerging in the US with figures like Elon Musk.
  • Market impacts include changes in interest rates and equity risk premiums. The 10-year US treasury rate has declined, while the equity risk premium has increased, indicating growing uncertainty about tariffs and the economy.
  • Company valuations will be affected differently based on their exposure to foreign markets, supply chains, and government spending. Technology companies are most exposed to foreign revenue risks, while utilities are least exposed.
  • Political connections and government involvement are becoming increasingly important factors in company valuations, particularly in the US. This shift requires investors to consider political and macroeconomic factors more heavily when assessing companies.

While it is easy to blame market uncertainty on Trump, tariffs and trade wars for the moment, the truth is that the forces that have led us here have been building for years, both in our political and economic arenas.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Bill Nygren: A Modern Approach To Value Investing

In this interview, Bill Nygren reflects on his career mistakes and lessons learned. These insights highlight the importance of balancing conviction with caution in investing and the need for value investors to adapt their strategies to include companies with significant intangible assets.

Howard Marks: Value matters more than quality

In this interview, Howard Marks shares his investment philosophy and lessons learned over his 55-year career, including contrarian investing, value versus quality and the inevitable market cycles.

Mohnish Pabrai: The Boom-Bust Mental Model

In this interview at the 2025 MOI Global, Mohnish Pabrai shares insights on his investment philosophy and current market perspectives. The conversation covers various industries and investment approaches, with particular focus on cyclical businesses and special situations.