Aswath Damodaran: The Uncertain Payoff from Alternative Investments

Professor Aswath Damodaran’s latest analysis challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding alternative investments, revealing significant gaps between marketing promises and actual performance. Aswath examines how institutional and individual investors have increasingly embraced alternatives like hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital, often with disappointing results despite decades of compelling sales pitches.

Alternative investments have gained mainstream acceptance over the past two decades, moving beyond their traditional institutional confines to target individual investors. The core argument for these investments rests on two pillars: their supposedly low correlation with traditional stocks and bonds, and their potential to generate excess returns through superior management and market inefficiencies. However, Damodaran’s analysis suggests these benefits may be largely illusory when subjected to rigorous scrutiny.

Here are the key takeaways:

  • Correlation benefits are overstated: Historical correlations between alternative investments and public markets are artificially low due to pricing lags in private assets and tend to converge during market crises when diversification is needed most.
  • Alpha generation has largely disappeared: Excess returns from hedge funds dropped to zero or below by 2009, while private equity returns have converged to resemble public market returns in recent years as competition has intensified.
  • High fees erode any remaining benefits: The traditional “two-and-twenty” fee structure (2% management fee plus 20% performance fee) creates a significant drag on returns that often eliminates net benefits for investors.
  • Institutional skepticism is growing: Even sophisticated investors like Yale’s endowment, once a pioneer in alternative investing, announced plans to sell billions in private equity holdings in 2025 after years of underperformance.
  • Individual investors should exercise extreme caution: As institutional demand wanes, alternative investment managers are increasingly targeting individual investors who may be less equipped to evaluate the risks and costs involved.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Michael Mauboussin: How to Handle Intangibles in Modern Value Investing

Michael Mauboussin, Head of Consilient Research at Morgan Stanley, delivered a compelling keynote presentation at the Ben Graham Centre for Value Investing’s 2025 conference, addressing how the rise of intangible assets has fundamentally altered the landscape of value investing.

Drawing from nearly a century of investment wisdom while adapting to modern realities, Mauboussin argues that traditional accounting methods have become increasingly inadequate for evaluating companies in today’s intangible-heavy economy. His presentation reveals that intangible investments now represent 1.7 times tangible investments in the U.S. economy, a complete reversal from 1977 when tangible investments dominated by a factor of 1.4.

Cliff Asness: Missing the Best Days Isn’t the Real Problem

Clifford Asness of AQR Capital Management revisits his 1999 rejected paper that challenged one of the most common arguments against market timing. The widespread belief that missing just a few of the market’s best days destroys long-term returns is fundamentally flawed, according to Asness.

His analysis shows that while missing the best performing days does hurt returns, missing the worst performing days provides symmetrical benefits. The author demonstrates through both historical data and simulations that this “evidence” against market timing is mathematically obvious and essentially useless for investment decision-making.

Asness argues that legitimate criticisms of market timing should focus on investors’ lack of skill rather than cherry-picked scenarios of perfect incompetence. His 25+ years of out-of-sample data confirms these findings, showing the argument remains as flawed today as it was when first proposed.

Warren Buffett: Lessons from the Oracle of Omaha

In this special celebratory episode from The Investor’s Podcast, host William Green shares his personal observations from attending the annual shareholder meeting in Omaha where the announcement was made, describing it as the most joyful meeting he’s ever attended.

The episode features powerful highlights from Green’s previous conversations with legendary investors including Joel Greenblatt, Nick Sleep, Thomas Russo, Chris Davis, Chuck Akre, and Christopher Bloomstran, all discussing Buffett’s profound influence on their investment approaches.

Chris Davis: Navigating Todays Turbulent Markets With Bill Miller

Two legendary portfolio managers, Chris Davis and Bill Miller, engaged in a comprehensive discussion about navigating today’s volatile investment landscape, drawing from their combined decades of experience managing billions in assets.

The conversation, structured around nine key topics, covers everything from investment temperament and market volatility to emerging technologies and geopolitical challenges. Miller, famous for outperforming the S&P 500 for 15 consecutive years while managing the Legg Mason Value Trust, and Davis share insights on stewardship, patience, and contrarian investing approaches. The discussion emphasizes the importance of long-term thinking, adaptability, and maintaining perspective during uncertain times.