Search
Investment Coaching
Linkedin X-twitter Envelope

Aswath Damodaran: Will The DOJ break Up the Big US Tech Companies?

Currently, US Department of Justice is considering breaking up Alphabet and requiring it to share data with competitors. This is part of an ongoing debate about the power accumulated by big tech companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Alphabet and Meta.

In this video and accompanying article, NYU professor Aswath Damodaran discuss the possibility of the US Department of Justice breaking up the big US tech companies. Other antitrust remedies include operating restraints and regulated monopolies.

Aswath argues that ultimately, strong antitrust actions against big tech will be a hard sell compared to actions against other dominant businesses in the past. Consumers directly benefit from big tech’s products and business models today and antitrust laws in the US have evolved over time, with enforcement ebbing and flowing.

Here are the key takeaways as it relates to:

  • There is tension between whether the objective is to enhance competition or protect consumers. The appointment of Lina Khan to head the FTC signaled a potential change in focus, arguing that platform-based companies like Amazon prioritize growth over profits and hurt both competitors and consumers in the long run. However, her arguments have not yet won over the courts.
  • The big US tech companies have become massive, with the top 5 accounting for over 20% of the total US market cap in 2024. They dominate day-to-day life. They have core businesses where they dominate, fund shaky side businesses with that cash flow, and subsidize many products/services for consumers. Critics argue this is unfair.
  • Breaking them up likely won’t benefit consumers, could worsen business efficiency, and only help competitors short-term. Regulated monopolies would destroy innovation incentives. Targeted changes around platform access, content payments, and user recourse may help. But forcing data sharing and banning cross-subsidies is less justified.
  • Doing nothing may be best, as tech lifecycles are short, innovation requires big payoffs, and disruption is always a threat.

Click here to go to the external source.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

François Rochon: Finding Great Businesses

December 16, 2024

In a recent interview, François Rochon discusses his approach to identifying exceptional businesses by combining quantitative and qualitative analysis. He starts by examining historical performance metrics such as return on capital, profit margins, debt levels, and the quality of earnings to identify strong companies.