Search
Get in touch!
Linkedin X-twitter Envelope

Julian Robins: Fundsmith’s Investment Philosophy and Market Outlook

Julian Robins, Head of Research and co-founder of UK based Fundsmith, shared compelling insights about quality investing and market dynamics in this recent podcast. Robins, who has been instrumental in managing the firm’s flagship equity fund alongside Terry Smith since 2010, brings extensive experience from his career spanning stockbroking and investment banking since 1984.

The discussion revealed Fundsmith’s disciplined approach to navigating current market uncertainties, from AI investment trends to changing consumer behaviors. Julian emphasized the importance of focusing on companies with sustainable competitive advantages that can compound returns over decades, rather than getting distracted by short-term market noise. His candid assessment of management quality and the evolving investment landscape provided valuable perspective on how quality-focused managers are adapting their strategies in today’s rapidly changing environment.

Here are the key takeaways:

  • Quality over speculation: Fundsmith maintains strict criteria for investment, focusing on companies that can sustainably compound high returns on capital without requiring excessive leverage, rather than chasing short-term market trends
  • AI investment selectivity: The firm owns Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet but avoids Amazon and Nvidia, with particular confidence in Meta’s position due to its direct control over AI capex spending and ability to pivot quickly based on results
  • Consumer market polarization: Data from portfolio companies like Marriott and industry observations show a clear divide where higher-income consumers continue spending while lower-income segments face significant pressure
  • Management quality paramount: Robins emphasized that poor management poses greater risks in today’s fast-moving world, with the firm becoming more willing to exit positions when leadership concerns arise
  • Shrinking opportunity set: The traditional consumer goods sector has become less attractive as an investment hunting ground, prompting exploration of new areas like specialized retailers (TJX), information services (Wolters Kluwer), and industrial suppliers (WW Grainger)

Click here to go to the external source.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Thomas Shrager: Superior Value Outside the U.S

July 3, 2025

In a comprehensive interview, Thomas Shrager and Jay Hill from the renowned New York value investing boutique Tweedy, Browne articulate their belief that the most compelling investment opportunities currently lie outside the United States. The veteran fund managers, who oversee portfolios for the 104-year-old firm, explain that international markets offer dramatically better value propositions than the overvalued U.S. equity market, which they describe as “priced for perfection” at 24 times earnings.

Aswath Damodaran: The Uncertain Payoff from Alternative Investments

June 18, 2025

Professor Aswath Damodaran’s latest analysis challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding alternative investments, revealing significant gaps between marketing promises and actual performance. Aswath examines how institutional and individual investors have increasingly embraced alternatives like hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital, often with disappointing results despite decades of compelling sales pitches.

Alternative investments have gained mainstream acceptance over the past two decades, moving beyond their traditional institutional confines to target individual investors. The core argument for these investments rests on two pillars: their supposedly low correlation with traditional stocks and bonds, and their potential to generate excess returns through superior management and market inefficiencies. However, Damodaran’s analysis suggests these benefits may be largely illusory when subjected to rigorous scrutiny.

Michael Mauboussin: How to Handle Intangibles in Modern Value Investing

June 18, 2025

Michael Mauboussin, Head of Consilient Research at Morgan Stanley, delivered a compelling keynote presentation at the Ben Graham Centre for Value Investing’s 2025 conference, addressing how the rise of intangible assets has fundamentally altered the landscape of value investing.

Drawing from nearly a century of investment wisdom while adapting to modern realities, Mauboussin argues that traditional accounting methods have become increasingly inadequate for evaluating companies in today’s intangible-heavy economy. His presentation reveals that intangible investments now represent 1.7 times tangible investments in the U.S. economy, a complete reversal from 1977 when tangible investments dominated by a factor of 1.4.

Cliff Asness: Missing the Best Days Isn’t the Real Problem

June 12, 2025

Clifford Asness of AQR Capital Management revisits his 1999 rejected paper that challenged one of the most common arguments against market timing. The widespread belief that missing just a few of the market’s best days destroys long-term returns is fundamentally flawed, according to Asness.

His analysis shows that while missing the best performing days does hurt returns, missing the worst performing days provides symmetrical benefits. The author demonstrates through both historical data and simulations that this “evidence” against market timing is mathematically obvious and essentially useless for investment decision-making.

Asness argues that legitimate criticisms of market timing should focus on investors’ lack of skill rather than cherry-picked scenarios of perfect incompetence. His 25+ years of out-of-sample data confirms these findings, showing the argument remains as flawed today as it was when first proposed.