Karen Karniol-Tambour: Today’s Radically Different Market Environment

In this Bridgewater Associates interview, Co-CIO Karen Karniol-Tambour discusses the firm’s latest outlook on the global economy, the investment landscape, and the urgent threats facing portfolios. The conversation centers on the shift to a new era of “modern mercantilism,” the implications for US assets and the dollar, the rising risk of recession, and the role of technological disruption, particularly artificial intelligence (AI).

Here are the key takeaways:

  • A New Era: Modern Mercantilism Is Reshaping the Investment Landscape:

The global economic environment has fundamentally changed from the past decades of US-led globalization and secular disinflation. We are now in a period of “modern mercantilism,” where countries prioritize national wealth accumulation, geopolitical strength, and economic self-sufficiency. This shift is not temporary and cannot easily be reversed, even with potential changes in political leadership.

  • Policy-Induced Slowdown and Rising Recession Risk

The transition to modern mercantilism, marked by tariffs, industrial policy, and increased uncertainty, is expected to cause a policy-induced global slowdown. The US faces a rising probability of recession, with uncertainty and direct effects from tariffs both acting as significant drags on growth. Other major economies are also affected, though some may offset the impact with proactive fiscal policy.

  • US Assets and the Dollar Face Exceptional Risks

US financial assets-especially equities-are highly vulnerable due to their heavy concentration in global portfolios and reliance on foreign capital inflows. The loss of trust in the US as a reliable partner and the potential for capital outflows create structural pressures on both US assets and the dollar. The dollar’s long-term secular rise is unlikely to continue, and investors should reconsider their currency exposures.

  • Central Banks, Especially the Fed, Are More Constrained

The Federal Reserve’s ability to respond to economic downturns is more limited than in the past, due to inflationary pressures from tariffs and the risk of capital outflows. While some other central banks may be able to ease more aggressively, the Fed faces a tougher balancing act, increasing the vulnerability of US assets.

  • AI as a Major, Uncertain Disruptor

The rise of AI and machine learning represents a once-in-a-generation technological disruption that will interact with the current economic environment. While AI could offset some productivity drags from mercantilist policies, expectations for its economic impact are already high, and there is significant uncertainty about which companies or sectors will ultimately benefit.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Thomas Shrager: Superior Value Outside the U.S

In a comprehensive interview, Thomas Shrager and Jay Hill from the renowned New York value investing boutique Tweedy, Browne articulate their belief that the most compelling investment opportunities currently lie outside the United States. The veteran fund managers, who oversee portfolios for the 104-year-old firm, explain that international markets offer dramatically better value propositions than the overvalued U.S. equity market, which they describe as “priced for perfection” at 24 times earnings.

Aswath Damodaran: The Uncertain Payoff from Alternative Investments

Professor Aswath Damodaran’s latest analysis challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding alternative investments, revealing significant gaps between marketing promises and actual performance. Aswath examines how institutional and individual investors have increasingly embraced alternatives like hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital, often with disappointing results despite decades of compelling sales pitches.

Alternative investments have gained mainstream acceptance over the past two decades, moving beyond their traditional institutional confines to target individual investors. The core argument for these investments rests on two pillars: their supposedly low correlation with traditional stocks and bonds, and their potential to generate excess returns through superior management and market inefficiencies. However, Damodaran’s analysis suggests these benefits may be largely illusory when subjected to rigorous scrutiny.

Michael Mauboussin: How to Handle Intangibles in Modern Value Investing

Michael Mauboussin, Head of Consilient Research at Morgan Stanley, delivered a compelling keynote presentation at the Ben Graham Centre for Value Investing’s 2025 conference, addressing how the rise of intangible assets has fundamentally altered the landscape of value investing.

Drawing from nearly a century of investment wisdom while adapting to modern realities, Mauboussin argues that traditional accounting methods have become increasingly inadequate for evaluating companies in today’s intangible-heavy economy. His presentation reveals that intangible investments now represent 1.7 times tangible investments in the U.S. economy, a complete reversal from 1977 when tangible investments dominated by a factor of 1.4.

Cliff Asness: Missing the Best Days Isn’t the Real Problem

Clifford Asness of AQR Capital Management revisits his 1999 rejected paper that challenged one of the most common arguments against market timing. The widespread belief that missing just a few of the market’s best days destroys long-term returns is fundamentally flawed, according to Asness.

His analysis shows that while missing the best performing days does hurt returns, missing the worst performing days provides symmetrical benefits. The author demonstrates through both historical data and simulations that this “evidence” against market timing is mathematically obvious and essentially useless for investment decision-making.

Asness argues that legitimate criticisms of market timing should focus on investors’ lack of skill rather than cherry-picked scenarios of perfect incompetence. His 25+ years of out-of-sample data confirms these findings, showing the argument remains as flawed today as it was when first proposed.