Li Lu: Charlie Munger’s enduring legacy

November 28th 2024 marks the first anniversary of Charlie Munger’s death. With the collaboration of Munger Institute and CITIC Publishing Group, Li Lu, Asset manager of the Munger family and founder of Himalaya Capital, accepted an online interview with Zhenghe Island on the same day.

This is the first interview Li has accepted with domestic media after four years. In the interview, he recalled his mentor Munger, summarized his spiritual legacy, and pointed out that it was Munger who made value investing possible in the global practice.

Here are the key takeaways:

  • Charlie Munger’s Enduring Legacy: Munger’s life exemplified the pursuit of universal wisdom, rationality, and the unity of knowledge and action. He was a role model who consistently inspired those around him through his integrity, intellectual rigor, and commitment to improving society. His influence extended beyond investing to leave a profound spiritual and intellectual legacy.
  • Evolution of Value Investing: Munger expanded Benjamin Graham’s foundational value investing principles by emphasizing the importance of buying great companies at reasonable prices and holding them long-term. He also advocated “fishing where there are fish,” meaning focusing on areas where one’s circle of competence aligns with opportunities. This approach enabled the global application of value investing practices.
  • Rationality as a Multi-Layered Concept: Munger’s concept of rationality encompassed four levels: deriving universal wisdom from real-world principles, applying multidisciplinary thinking, avoiding systemic irrationalities (e.g., behavioral biases), and respecting common sense. His framework for rationality is central to his decision-making philosophy.
  • Global Value Investment and Modernization: Li Lu emphasized the global applicability of value investing in diverse economic environments, including emerging markets. He highlighted its relevance in the ongoing modernization process, which he described as an unstoppable shift in civilization paradigms akin to the agricultural revolution.
  • AI as Opportunity and Existential Risk: Li Lu discussed the transformative potential of AI, likening its significance to landmark inventions like fire and electricity. While AI offers immense opportunities for advancing human capabilities, it also poses existential risks if it surpasses human intelligence and becomes uncontrollable. He stressed the need for global cooperation to ensure AI development remains safe and aligned with human interests. These insights underscore Charlie Munger’s profound influence on investing, rational thinking, and navigating complex global challenges.

Original Chinese text can be found here: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/bxYnXKRTduh_jm-L8DrQ_g

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Thomas Shrager: Superior Value Outside the U.S

In a comprehensive interview, Thomas Shrager and Jay Hill from the renowned New York value investing boutique Tweedy, Browne articulate their belief that the most compelling investment opportunities currently lie outside the United States. The veteran fund managers, who oversee portfolios for the 104-year-old firm, explain that international markets offer dramatically better value propositions than the overvalued U.S. equity market, which they describe as “priced for perfection” at 24 times earnings.

Aswath Damodaran: The Uncertain Payoff from Alternative Investments

Professor Aswath Damodaran’s latest analysis challenges the conventional wisdom surrounding alternative investments, revealing significant gaps between marketing promises and actual performance. Aswath examines how institutional and individual investors have increasingly embraced alternatives like hedge funds, private equity, and venture capital, often with disappointing results despite decades of compelling sales pitches.

Alternative investments have gained mainstream acceptance over the past two decades, moving beyond their traditional institutional confines to target individual investors. The core argument for these investments rests on two pillars: their supposedly low correlation with traditional stocks and bonds, and their potential to generate excess returns through superior management and market inefficiencies. However, Damodaran’s analysis suggests these benefits may be largely illusory when subjected to rigorous scrutiny.

Michael Mauboussin: How to Handle Intangibles in Modern Value Investing

Michael Mauboussin, Head of Consilient Research at Morgan Stanley, delivered a compelling keynote presentation at the Ben Graham Centre for Value Investing’s 2025 conference, addressing how the rise of intangible assets has fundamentally altered the landscape of value investing.

Drawing from nearly a century of investment wisdom while adapting to modern realities, Mauboussin argues that traditional accounting methods have become increasingly inadequate for evaluating companies in today’s intangible-heavy economy. His presentation reveals that intangible investments now represent 1.7 times tangible investments in the U.S. economy, a complete reversal from 1977 when tangible investments dominated by a factor of 1.4.

Cliff Asness: Missing the Best Days Isn’t the Real Problem

Clifford Asness of AQR Capital Management revisits his 1999 rejected paper that challenged one of the most common arguments against market timing. The widespread belief that missing just a few of the market’s best days destroys long-term returns is fundamentally flawed, according to Asness.

His analysis shows that while missing the best performing days does hurt returns, missing the worst performing days provides symmetrical benefits. The author demonstrates through both historical data and simulations that this “evidence” against market timing is mathematically obvious and essentially useless for investment decision-making.

Asness argues that legitimate criticisms of market timing should focus on investors’ lack of skill rather than cherry-picked scenarios of perfect incompetence. His 25+ years of out-of-sample data confirms these findings, showing the argument remains as flawed today as it was when first proposed.