Michael Mauboussin: pattern recognition works best in stable environments with a clear cause and effect

As part of Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Michael Mauboussin has published an article that goes into depth with the concept of “Pattern Recognition”. In Danish, this can best be described as ‘pattern recognition’.

In the article, they discuss the potential and dangers of pattern recognition, which many investors often cite as the basis for their actions. Mauboussin writes that while it can be an effective tool when used correctly, it can also be misleading and lead to overconfidence.

They discuss when it tends to work well, why it can be misleading, and offer ways to help improve it.

Pattern recognition tends to work well in stable environments where cause and effect are clear and feedback is effective but poorly where causality and feedback are limited.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Bill Nygren: A Modern Approach To Value Investing

In this interview, Bill Nygren reflects on his career mistakes and lessons learned. These insights highlight the importance of balancing conviction with caution in investing and the need for value investors to adapt their strategies to include companies with significant intangible assets.

Howard Marks: Value matters more than quality

In this interview, Howard Marks shares his investment philosophy and lessons learned over his 55-year career, including contrarian investing, value versus quality and the inevitable market cycles.

Mohnish Pabrai: The Boom-Bust Mental Model

In this interview at the 2025 MOI Global, Mohnish Pabrai shares insights on his investment philosophy and current market perspectives. The conversation covers various industries and investment approaches, with particular focus on cyclical businesses and special situations.