Rob Vinall: Moats Are Becoming Less Relevant

During his recent presentation at the Value Investor Conference, Rob Vinall explored the concept of economic moats in both static and dynamic economies.

Historically, a wide moat provided significant advantages, ensuring stability and wealth, much like the landowners of 300 years ago. However, in today’s rapidly evolving economy, a wide moat can become a liability, fostering complacency and impeding swift adaptation to competitive threats. Rob highlighted Google as an example of a company that might be hindered by its wide moat, potentially becoming overextended and struggling to navigate the transition to AI.

And I would argue in a fast changing economy it’s probably a disadvantage to have a moat because it’s going to make you fat and lazy. And it’s going to slow you down when it comes to reacting to competitive threats.

So in a more of a dynamic economy you really want companies which have great execution and you should be actually actively fearful if the moat is too wide because that’s probably going to slow them down.

And the company that really springs to mind today a little bit is maybe Google as well because they obviously… it’s become this enormous very over bloated complacent organization facing an existential threat, perhaps also opportunity in the AI transition.

Share the news

Disclaimer of liability

The above has been prepared by Børsgade ApS for information purposes and cannot be regarded as a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security. Nor can the information etc. be regarded as recommendations or advice of a legal, accounting or tax nature. Børsgade cannot be held liable for losses caused by customers’/users’ actions – or lack thereof – based on the information in the above. We have made every effort to ensure that the information in the above is complete and accurate, but cannot guarantee this and accept no liability for errors or omissions.

Readers are advised that investing may involve a risk of loss that cannot be determined in advance, and that past performance and price development cannot be used as a reliable indicator of future performance and price development. For further information please contact info@borsgade.dk

You might also find this interesting:

Stanley Druckenmiller: a strategy of Invest and Investigate

In this interview with our Norwegian friends over at Norges Bank, Stanley Druckenmiller explains how he learned to bet (really) big when the odds are heavily in your favor and how he is using a strategy of invest and investigate. Both inspired by his old colleague George Soros.

Mohnish Pabrai: How I do Security Analysis

In this interview, Mohnish Pabrai outlines his full investment strategy, emphasizing the importance of staying within his “circle of competence” and drawing lessons from seasoned investors.

Howard Marks: Don’t Rely on Economic Predictions

In a recent interview, Howard Marks argues that economic forecasting offers little value to investors. He notes that even top investors like Warren Buffett steer clear of relying on economic or market predictions when making decisions.

Aswath Damodaran: The Sugar Daddy Effect

In his latest article, NYU professor Aswath Damodaran explores the common challenges faced by three types of entities that have access to assured funding: corporate venture capital, sovereign wealth funds, and green energy investments.